Northwest Observer Forums Home
 Search       Members   Calendar   Help   Home 
Search by username
Not logged in - Login | Register 
Northwest Observer Forums > M.A.A.N. > Green Thumb Topics > Land Conservation / Open Space Preservation

Land Conservation / Open Space Preservation
 Moderated by: Steve Adkins  
 New Topic   Reply   Print 
AuthorPost
Jim Flynt
Member
 

Joined: Jul 29th, 2006
Location: Bermuda Triangle
Posts: 1372
Status:  Offline
Mana: 
 Posted: Jul 28th, 2007 09:34 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Edited by Poster.

Last edited on Aug 5th, 2007 02:36 am by Jim Flynt



____________________
"Take no prisoners"
Possumhund
Member


Joined: Apr 14th, 2007
Location: Stokesdale, North Carolina USA
Posts: 50
Status:  Online
Mana: 
 Posted: Jul 29th, 2007 12:31 am
 Quote  Reply 
I can agree with you comletely there' Jim. Plus there's the "soft" cost to the public at large, quality of life.



____________________
"Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts." Winston Churchill

ff12
Member


Joined: Oct 25th, 2005
Location:  
Posts: 310
Status:  Offline
Mana: 
 Posted: Jul 29th, 2007 04:14 am
 Quote  Reply 
The Comm. of Ag. for NC is trying to go the conservation easement route and he did get some money included in the state budget. Most of that money will end up down east due to Basnight and his friends that control state govt.

Farmers could stay on their land but the tax rates even for ag uses have gone up tremendously, add to that rising production costs, labor costs ,equipment and the fact that what they get for their crops has not matched their expenditures makes growing houses look pretty inviting. (Wheat sells for about .30 cents a bushel more today than it did n 1950)

Jim Flynt
Member
 

Joined: Jul 29th, 2006
Location: Bermuda Triangle
Posts: 1372
Status:  Offline
Mana: 
 Posted: Jul 29th, 2007 05:46 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Edited by Poster.

Last edited on Aug 5th, 2007 02:38 am by Jim Flynt



____________________
"Take no prisoners"
Possumhund
Member


Joined: Apr 14th, 2007
Location: Stokesdale, North Carolina USA
Posts: 50
Status:  Online
Mana: 
 Posted: Aug 1st, 2007 06:52 pm
 Quote  Reply 
ff12 wrote:
Farmers could stay on their land but the tax rates even for ag uses have gone up tremendously, add to that rising production costs, labor costs ,equipment and the fact that what they get for their crops has not matched their expenditures makes growing houses look pretty inviting. (Wheat sells for about .30 cents a bushel more today than it did n 1950)


What you say is certainly true. But farmers, while they must make a profit to survive, farm because they love their profession, they love the land and nature, and they prize the lifestyle farming affords their families. I don't think what we see around here is "in production" farmland being sold for development. Mostly what we see is children inheriting former farmland and either because they cannot afford the taxes or they do not live in the area and cannot take care of the property they convert the land to cash. I suspect for the most part these children are well off and the proceeds of the sale, while affording them some discretionary spending money, are not absolutely needed. If it were, the parents would have sold that land sooner to care for their grown children and grandchildren.

The Piedmont Land Conservancy and other land preservation groups try to identify farmland owners who want to see their property remain in a natural condition. Then between the money paid for the conservation easement, any productive use the landowner still gets from the land, and lowered property tax rates the landowner continues to profit from their land while preserving it in perpetuity.



____________________
"Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts." Winston Churchill

DOGGETTJA
Member


Joined: Oct 24th, 2005
Location: Summerfield
Posts: 1198
Status:  Online
Mana: 
 Posted: Aug 2nd, 2007 10:30 am
 Quote  Reply 
Possumhund- As I remember though donating land may not be that simiple. That is what happened over on Lake Brandt road where the huge houses are. Ms Jones donated her land for a bird sanctuary but she left no money with it so it was sold for houses and the land was bought in a cheaper area with part of the money and the rest of the money is kept in a trust fund to pay for anything that might be done to the land. So some other area of the state benefited from her donation which is ok but wouldn't it have been nice to have had a hundred acre bird sanctuary in this area?

Possumhund
Member


Joined: Apr 14th, 2007
Location: Stokesdale, North Carolina USA
Posts: 50
Status:  Online
Mana: 
 Posted: Aug 2nd, 2007 12:07 pm
 Quote  Reply 
You are absolutely correct, Jane. Conservation easements just prohibit future development as long as the normal expenses of maintaining the property are kept paid up. If they are not the courts can revoke the easement and take the land to sell and pay off debt. 

Is there a good alternative to conservation easements besides a direct property donation to a trust or local/state government?   



____________________
"Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts." Winston Churchill

Jim Flynt
Member
 

Joined: Jul 29th, 2006
Location: Bermuda Triangle
Posts: 1372
Status:  Offline
Mana: 
 Posted: Aug 3rd, 2007 12:35 am
 Quote  Reply 
Edited by Poster.

Last edited on Aug 5th, 2007 02:39 am by Jim Flynt



____________________
"Take no prisoners"
DOGGETTJA
Member


Joined: Oct 24th, 2005
Location: Summerfield
Posts: 1198
Status:  Online
Mana: 
 Posted: Aug 3rd, 2007 02:11 am
 Quote  Reply 
No Jim she gave her property to the UNC, I believe it was, as a bird sanctuary but she had no trust fund so the university sold the land and purchased land else where .

Jim Flynt
Member
 

Joined: Jul 29th, 2006
Location: Bermuda Triangle
Posts: 1372
Status:  Offline
Mana: 
 Posted: Aug 3rd, 2007 02:20 am
 Quote  Reply 
Edited by Poster.

Last edited on Aug 5th, 2007 02:34 am by Jim Flynt



____________________
"Take no prisoners"
CUZ
Member


Joined: Jul 24th, 2007
Location: Stokesdale, North Carolina USA
Posts: 49
Status:  Offline
Mana: 
 Posted: Aug 6th, 2007 01:47 am
 Quote  Reply 
BUMP



____________________
For what it's worth.

Sincerely, Short, Fat,& Loud.
PaulS
Member
 

Joined: May 1st, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 8
Status:  Offline
Mana: 
 Posted: Aug 8th, 2007 12:23 pm
 Quote  Reply 
I understand that users are allowed to go back to their posts and make edits, but what I don't understand is why someone would take the time to make numerous posts to a topic, and then go back several days later and remove the entire text of every single post they have made. This is not the first time/topic where this has occurred. Can someone, perhaps even the original author, enlighten me as to how the removal of earlier posts is advantageous to the discussion of this or any other topic?

darrelldawg
Member


Joined: Jul 23rd, 2007
Location: Some Where On Haw River Head Waters, North Carolina USA
Posts: 26
Status:  Offline
Mana: 
 Posted: Aug 8th, 2007 02:12 pm
 Quote  Reply 
PaulS wrote: I understand that users are allowed to go back to their posts and make edits, but what I don't understand is why someone would take the time to make numerous posts to a topic, and then go back several days later and remove the entire text of every single post they have made. This is not the first time/topic where this has occurred. Can someone, perhaps even the original author, enlighten me as to how the removal of earlier posts is advantageous to the discussion of this or any other topic?

 

Good point!

PaulS been wondering that my dawg self! How can some body be deemed creditable when after they go back and edit the original post to have a different meaning after they get a response? or as you point out delete their entire history of posts. That would lead this dawg to think that they been out in the heat without a hat!

Darrell D. Dawg

author-7 effective ways  a dawg can beat the heat!



____________________
No Bud before its time...
Its 5 o'clock somewhere...
bama80
Member


Joined: Oct 25th, 2005
Location: Stokesdale, North Carolina USA
Posts: 772
Status:  Online
Mana: 
 Posted: Aug 8th, 2007 04:30 pm
 Quote  Reply 
I am sure we all say/type things in the heat of the moment that in retrospect.. we would not want them preserved for all eternity. One can make their own assumptions as to the reason for the edit (guilt, secrecy, etc).

 

I for one am glad that I have to right/privilege to edit my posts. Even Thoguh I hardly evar botherr.



____________________
Roll Tide and Go Pack. Maybe or maybe not in that order. [insert profound quote here]

This post will self destruct in 10.......9......8....
Cracker Jax
Member


Joined: Oct 23rd, 2005
Location: Summerfield, USA
Posts: 4722
Status:  Offline
Mana: 
 Posted: Aug 8th, 2007 04:33 pm
 Quote  Reply 

You make a very good point Paul S. I can see where complete edits would make it extremely difficult for people who aren't keeping up on a daily basis to know what folks on here are talking about.


Sort of like listening in on one end of a phone conversation.......



____________________
Opinions in this post are mine. Do not copy, distribute, mass mail or quote out of context without my consent.

 Current time is 12:24 pm
Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3  4  Next Page Last Page  




Powered by WowBB 1.7 - Copyright © 2003-2006 Aycan Gulez
Page processed in 0.1890 seconds (9% database + 91% PHP). 17 queries executed.